Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Support the Troops by Bringing Them Home

Earlier today, while visiting a military base, President Bush said of the War on Terror, "We've lost some fantastic young men and women. And we honor their service and their sacrifice by completing the mission, by helping a generation of Americans grow up in a peaceful world." This echoes the same message war supporters shout at anyone who believes we should withdraw our soldiers from Iraq. Supposedly, the highest honor we can give a soldier who has died in Iraq is to get the job done; and any talk of pulling American soldiers out of Iraq shows a lack of support for those soldiers. Democrats, nervous as they have been with their newfound power in Congress during the first few months of this year, blindly accepted this mantra. Every piece of legislation Democrats have proposed that sends a message of being against the surge in Iraq has spent more time making sure to note support of the troops than to denounce the war.

But just imagine, for a moment, that you were a soldier in Iraq. You've seen more death in the last month than most people see in a lifetime. Every day, you go about your duties, without any guarantee that you'll survive the day. You might have sub-par body armor and weapons, and the vehicles you ride in are easily turned into scrap metal by IEDs. This might be the sort of life you're willing to lead, if you're fighting for a good cause, but in Iraq what noble intentions may exist are weak, at best. Now ask yourself: Would you rather people show their support by keeping you in this impossible and pointless demonstration of American folly, or by realizing that's all it is and bringing you home to your loved ones?

Oh, but we're fighting for a good cause! We've brought the fight to them so we don't have to fight them here! We're making the world a safer place! We're fighting terrorism, you un-American swine!

A good cause? Are you kidding me? Since when is invading a sovereign nation under false pretenses of a connection to a terrorist attack, killing tens of thousands of civilians, creating a political vacuum in the middle of a volatile region, and throwing the whole place into a state of chaos a good cause? World War II? Good cause. Afghanistan? Good cause. Iraq? Not so much.

But you supported the war in the beginning! You flip-flopper!

Based upon the information the American people were fed by the Bush Administration early on, yes, I thought it was a noble cause. Four years of watching the death toll rise, and the Arab world stumble toward complete chaos, and, most importantly, learning that we were deceived as to the original intent of the war have taught me otherwise. I cannot support a war that was initiated under false pretenses, and only later was tied to the advancement of freedom and democracy around the world.

Well, what about the soldiers who have died? We must honor their sacrifice by finishing what they started!

There was no reason to put them in a position to die in the first place. Attempting to finish an unfinishable job in no way honors their deaths. Honor their deaths by making sure no more of their brothers have do die for the lost cause they died for.

Come to your senses, people! Calling for a troop withdrawal is in no way contrary to supporting the soldiers. We're not talking about a mad scramble out of the country, allowing the insurgents to fire at our soldiers' backs. We're talking about a steady decrease in troop levels until all of our soldiers are out of that ridiculous hell hole and back home where they belong. Support our soldiers. Bring them home.


Rainier96 said...

Amen, amen, amen.

I was sorry when Obama -- who I have high hopes for in 2008 -- felt he had to apologize for saying that 3,000 lives of American soldiers had been "wasted" in Iraq. Everyone jumped on him, saying that a person who dies for his country never wastes his life. Of course he doesn't -- he's died nobly and his family should be proud. But his life WAS wasted by the government that sent him there, to a death that accomplished nothing.

Just another example of playing around with words to make it difficult for voters to think clearly about what's going on.

Does your school have a good school paper? If so, I sure hope you write for it. I'm really impressed, and I really enjoy reading your posts. This one would make a good newspaper editorial. I hope some of your friends read them as well. And your teachers, too, come to think of it.

PS -- I forgive you for supporting the war when you were 12!! :-) A lot of Senators can't rely on the same excuse!

Rainier96 said...

And thanks for finally straightening up your MySpace page. It was making my eyes hurt. :D

Zachary Freier said...

Yes, we have a fabulous school newspaper. It's won statewide and even nationwide honors and awards.

No, I do not write for it. I could've joined it this year, but it would've occupied a quarter of my school time, which I simply couldn't do. A shame, really.

Zachary Freier said...

P.S.: You're not supposed to realize I was only 12 when the thing began! It was supposed to be a neat insight into the stupidity of calling Democrats flip-floppers for going back on their Iraq war votes.

Rainier96 said...

Hahaha! It was a neat insight. But as I was reading it, gosh, I had this kind of vision. Right in front of my eyes the equation jumped out at me: 16 - 4 = 12. I just couldn't help myself.